Preserving America's Heritagesm
ACHP Retrospective Website
National Historic Preservation Program
Working with Section 106
Section 106 Successes
Federal & State Programs
Working with Tribes and NHOs
Training & Education
Youth & Historic Preservation
Involving All People in Preservation
Unified Federal Review
Infrastructure and Section 106
No Fear Act
ACHP Joins National Trust for Historic Preservation and National Park Service in Pilot Project with Historically Black Colleges and Universities
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is partnering with the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s HOPE Crew; Morgan State University (MSU) in Baltimore, Maryland; and the National Park Service’s Western Center for Historic Preservation on “Touching History: Preservation in Practice.” Six MSU architecture students spent June 11-21 training at the Center, located at White Grass Ranch in Grand Teton National Park in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Read more.
San Francisco Landmark Highlights Pride Month
As LGBTQ Pride Month draws to a close, the ACHP wanted to highlight a San Francisco Historic Landmark, 573-575 Castro Street, which was the residence of Harvey Milk and the location of Castro Camera, the storefront out of which Milk ran his photography retail shop and which also served as his campaign headquarters. Milk became one of the first openly gay elected officials in US history when he was elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977. The Harvey Milk Foundation notes that Milk “symbolized the freedom to live life with authenticity to millions of LGBT women and men around the world.” Milk served on the Board of Supervisors for less than one year before his brutal assassination, but continues to serve as an inspiring figure in the LGBTQ community.
In 2000, the city of San Francisco designated the site as its first LGBTQ historic landmark. According to the Planning Commission’s report, the building itself was built in 1893 by architect Fernando Nelson in the stick-Eastlake style. Milk moved to Castro Street in 1972 and opened the Castro Camera shop with his partner Scott Smith in 1973. Milk ran for public office four times before finally being elected in 1977. His speech writer, Frank Robinson said that Milk “was the epitome of grass roots politics.” His biographer, Randy Shilts wrote, “When Harvey was in, Castro Camera became less a business establishment than a vest-pocket City Hall from which Harvey held court.”
To read more about LGBTQ history in San Francisco, click here.
To read more from the San Francisco Planning Commission’s report, click here.
Newly Updated Online Tool Assists with Involving Indian Tribes Early in Section 106 Process
A key to successful Section 106 consultation is inviting interested parties to the table as early as possible in the process. However, sometimes sound research is needed to determine which Indian tribes have an interest in the project area. A new source of information to aid in the process is the Tribal Directory Assistance Tool (TDAT), developed and administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Environment and Energy (HUD). This web-based tribal contact database contains information about the geographic areas of current and ancestral interest to federally recognized Indian tribes. Read more about this useful tool that ACHP member agency HUD is promoting.
Historic Wisconsin School Building Birthplace of Flag Day
A little one-room country schoolhouse in Waubeka, Wisconsin is on the National Register of Historic Places for its connection to the origins of Flag Day. It was there that a 19-year-old teacher and his students held the first known observance of Flag Birth Day on June 14, 1885, using a 10-inch 38-star flag propped up in a glass bottle. Teacher Bernard Cigrand had his students, mostly descendants of Luxembourger immigrants, honor Old Glory by “reading essays they had written and discussing the flag’s history and meaning,” according to the Wisconsin Historical Society.
Cigrand had a profound love for the American flag and launched a 31-year campaign for a national observance of the flag’s birth. The Stars and Stripes were adopted by the Continental Congress on June 14, 1777. Inspired by Cigrand’s actions, President Woodrow Wilson proclaimed June 14 to be Flag Day, though the day was not officially established by Congress until 1949, which also declared the Flag would be displayed on all government buildings. Cigrand, who went on to become a professor of dentistry and college dean, is known as the Father of Flag Day.
The Stony Hill Schoolhouse held its last classes in 1916 but is now a museum and the site of Flag Day celebrations, held annually on the Sunday before June 14.
To learn more about Flag Day, visit http://www.nationalflagday.com/.
LGBT Pride Month – Historic NYC Bar Still Serving Gay Population More than 50 Years After ‘Sip-In’
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month is celebrated each June to honor the 1969 Stonewall riots in Manhattan, a tipping point for the Gay Liberation Movement in the United States. However, a full three years prior to Stonewall, a “sip-in” was staged at another New York City establishment, Julius’ Bar. Listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2016, Julius’ Bar, located at the corner of West 10th Street and Waverly Place in Greenwich Village, was built in 1826. After serving as a grocery store, the structure has been a bar since 1864.
According to the bar’s website, it was a popular speakeasy during Prohibition that was frequented by many of the most famous jazz and literary legends of that time: “It started to attract a gay clientele in the 1950s and it is surely the oldest gay bar in the city and the oldest bar in the village.” On April 21, 1966 four activists from the Mattachine Society staged the “sip-in,” ordering drinks and declaring they were gay, at Julius’ Bar to challenge the New York Liquor Authority’s regulation prohibiting bars and restaurants from serving alcohol to homosexuals. This action sparked an investigation from the NYC Commission on Human Rights and led to overturning the regulation in court.
Today, the bar’s owners continue its social-mindedness by supporting the local community by donating to several charities and community organizations. Click here for more information about Julius’ Bar and its listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
ACHP Publishes FAQs for Lead Agencies in Section 106
The ACHP is pleased to announce the availability of a set of FAQs on federal agency coordination where an undertaking subject to review in accordance with Section 106 of the NHPA involves more than one federal agency. These FAQs provide detail about the option for federal agencies to designate a lead for Section 106 purposes. The FAQs cover issues related to the roles of lead and non-lead agencies, the procedure for designating a lead agency, and responsibilities for lead agencies during a Section 106 review. This information is timely given the current emphasis on conducting concurrent reviews and coordinating federal agency environmental review processes toward "One Federal Decision ." Access the new FAQs here.
Apply Now for Cultural Heritage Fellowship
The ACHP, in conjunction with the Smithsonian’s Office of Fellowships and Internships, announces we are now accepting applications for the Fall 2018 Cultural Heritage Fellowship.
The Smithsonian is pleased to have the Anacostia Community Museum (ACM) on board for this year’s fellowship with the theme: Heritage of the District of Columbia. Prospective candidates should have an interest in cultural or historic preservation; and local DC candidates are strongly encouraged to apply.
Applications will be accepted through June 30, 2018, and will consist of a project proposal, resume, a letter of recommendation, and letters of commitment from advisors at the ACHP and ACM. All the details can be found here.
New Chairman-Nominee Has Senate Hearing Today
May 15–ACHP Chairman-Nominate Aimee Jorjani testified before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee today prior to the Senate vote on her confirmation. Ms. Jorjani will become the first full-time ACHP chairman if she is confirmed. Read more about the committee meeting and her testimony.
Nuclear Energy Tribal Working Group Meets at the ACHP
The ACHP hosted a meeting on April 18 with the U.S. Department of Energy’s Nuclear Energy Tribal Working Group to introduce the members to the National Historic Preservation Act and Section 106. Office of Native American Affairs Director Valerie Hauser gave an overview of the ACHP and how the office works to assist tribes. Office of Federal Agency Programs Director Reid Nelson talked about the Section 106 process. Working group members were encouraged to take the free webinar, What is Section 106?
ACHP Signs One Federal Decision MOU Regarding Infrastructure Projects
The ACHP was one of several federal agencies that signed the One Federal Decision MOU establishing a more coordinated and timely process for environmental reviews of major infrastructure projects. A link to the MOU is available here. For more information, see the ACHP’s web page http://www.achp.gov/infrastructure/coordination.html
Highlights of the ACHP Business Meeting
An overview of actions from the ACHP spring business meeting is now available here.
ACHP Adopts Policy Statement on Controversial Commemorative Works
At its March business meeting, the ACHP adopted a policy statement on the treatment of controversial commemorative works–public memorials and monuments that honor divisive historical figures or events. Through the guiding principles of this policy statement, the ACHP seeks to promote informed decision making and responsible stewardship of controversial but nevertheless historically significant commemorative works. In doing so, the ACHP acknowledges it is essential for decision makers to do the following:
- directly confront history’s difficult chapters;
- consult broadly with the public to ascertain contemporary community views;
- consider a range of management alternatives; and
- promote public education regarding all aspects (positive and negative) of the nation’s history.
Read the policy statement here.
ACHP Meets for Spring Business
Members of the ACHP met March 22 in Washington, DC for their spring business meeting. They discussed the pending transition to a full-time chairman following the President’s announcement of his intent to nominate Aimee Jorjani to that position. Members will need to renegotiate the agency’s strategic plan and revisit the operating procedures and office structure. Chairman Milford Wayne Donaldson will be appointing a member task force to work on these issues in the near term.
Members also discussed the Administration’s infrastructure initiative, noting the ACHP has been fully engaged with the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council. Issues were raised regarding the Federal Communications Commission’s program of collocating cell equipment on towers that may not have undergone Section 106 review in the early 2000s. The FCC has been working with the ACHP to develop a Program Comment for the project.
Members voted to approve a policy statement on Commemorative Works and also debuted the 2018 Section 3 Report to the President on stewardship of federal historic property. The recommendations will be streamlined and prioritized. The ACHP will also be taking part in two youth engagement projects involving students in northern California and Morgan State University learning preservation crafts and trades.
President Announces Intent to Nominate New ACHP Chairman
March 13—The President announced his intent to nominate Aimee Jorjani as the ACHP’s first full-time chairman. She has a long career in historic preservation and related interests. As a result of 2016 legislation, the full-time ACHP chairman position is Senate-confirmed, so current Chairman Milford Wayne Donaldson will remain in the job until Jorjani is confirmed. Read the ACHP press release here. Read the White House announcement here.
New Report Cites Historic Tax Credits Create Thousands of Jobs and Billions of Dollars in Investment
March 12--The National Park Service issued its FY 2017 annual report on the federal historic tax incentives program. Commonly known as the Historic Tax Credit, the program provides a 20 percent federal tax credit for rehabilitation of historic buildings for business or income-producing uses. According to the report, FY 2017 saw more than $5.8 billion in private investment in historic preservation and community revitalization due to the Historic Tax Credit and the creation of almost 107,000 jobs.
ACHP Announces Report to the President on Federal Historic Property Stewardship
Feb. 15—The ACHP today sent the fifth triennial report on the status of federal historic property to President Trump in accordance with E.O. 13287 “Preserve America.” The report offers findings and recommendations for agencies, states, tribes, and local organizations to protect and preserve historic property. Read the report here.
A look back—the ACHP’s First 50 years
As part of the ACHP’s recognition of its 50th anniversary in 2016, the agency has completed a historical review and summary of major preservation policies and practices championed by the ACHP since its genesis.
With assistance from the ACHP Foundation and the firm Cultural Heritage Partners, an online module has been created titled “The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s First 50 Years—Shaping National Preservation Policy.” The module is focused on “how the ACHP has advanced federal support for historic preservation and developed useful strategies for addressing major preservation issues since its creation in 1966.”
The site invites members of the public to explore ACHP work over the last five decades through a historical timeline and essays, images, online interviews and comments, and resource documents on 12 topics:
Native American Heritage
Planning and Consultation
The project is intended to complement the existing online collection of Section 106 Success Stories that help illustrate the impact of the Section 106 process on the preservation of our heritage in the U.S. since 1966.
Section 106 News Now Available
The ACHP has sent out its latest e-newsletter about activities in Section 106 and historic preservation work. Read it here. To subscribe to receive the next issue in your inbox, email email@example.com.
ACHP Issues Program Comment to Speed Broadband Communications Work
As part of its efforts to expedite the regulatory approval of communications technologies, the ACHP today announced new procedures for the review of next-generation broadband projects on federal lands as required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Read the press release here. Read Q&As; about the new Program Comment here. Please also see this handy user's guide that was produced by an applicant with coordination from the ACHP and CEQ.
ACHP Addresses Hurricane Response for Historic Preservation
In the wake of the unprecedented destruction resulting from Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, the ACHP has been working to help address the impacts to historic properties. Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Puerto Rico, Texas, and the U.S. Virgin Islands were hard hit by the storms. (The impact on the island of St. John was particularly catastrophic.) The ACHP has reached out to the affected State and Tribal Historic Preservation Offices and to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to help coordinate how disaster recovery efforts are addressing historic properties and how review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will be expedited. The ACHP also has been in discussions with preservation partners regarding potential congressional action on supplemental funding and tax credits to support rehabilitation of storm-ravaged historic properties. Read more here.
ACHP and NASA Partner for Mission Control Restoration Project
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation is using its donation authority to help the Johnson Space Center restore Apollo-era facilities in time for the 50th anniversary of the moon landing. Read more here.
President Issues New Infrastructure Executive Order
On Aug. 15, the President issued the Presidential Executive Order on Establishing Discipline and Accountability in the Environmental Review and Permitting Process for Infrastructure, with the goal of increasing the coordination, predictability, and transparency of federal environmental review and the permitting process for infrastructure projects. The EO directs federal agencies to complete their environmental reviews of “major infrastructure projects” within an average of two years, guided by a lead agency that coordinates all required federal environmental reviews to result in “one federal decision.” The ACHP anticipates the EO will sharpen the focus on agency planning and decision-making efforts. Read more here.
Section 106 E-Newsletters
The ACHP is sending out news related to Section 106 best practices, trends, ACHP staff, courses, and other items of interest. Read the latest edition of Section 106 News here.
Sign up to receive the e-newsletter in your own inbox by emailing your request to firstname.lastname@example.org.
New Infrastructure Website Offers Resources
The ACHP is working to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of reviews carried out under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for infrastructure development. Our goal is to help federal agencies, applicants for federal permits and assistance, SHPOs/THPOs, Indian tribes, and other Section 106 participants find ways infrastructure development and preservation of our nation's important historic places can be accomplished together. The ACHP has compiled news, background information, examples, and other resources on a new web page. Please refer to it as you navigate infrastructure projects.
ACHP Releases Report on Tribal Consultation
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation today issued a report designed to promote more effective consultation with Indian tribes on decisions by federal agencies on infrastructure projects. Read the report here. It is a companion to a separate report issued in January by the Departments of the Interior and Justice and the Army Corps of Engineers regarding tribal input in infrastructure decisions. That report was prepared in response to a series of consultations held on the issue last fall. Many participants in those sessions–as well as those submitting written comments to the agencies–raised concerns about how Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act has been used in recent years to govern consideration of tribal input. Read the press release here. Read more.
New Section 101(d)(5) Guidance for Indian Tribes
Section 101(d)(5) of the National Historic Preservation Act allows the ACHP to enter into agreements with Indian tribes to substitute tribal historic preservation regulations for the ACHP's regulations on tribal lands. This guidance will assist tribal governments that may be considering such an agreement with the ACHP. For a copy of the guidance, click here.
ACHP Chairman Highlights Benefits of Historic Tax Credit in Letter to Congress
As Congress weighs various proposals for tax reform, ACHP Chairman Milford Wayne Donaldson has asked the House Ways and Means Committee to consider the past success and future potential of the federal historic rehabilitation tax credit. Read his letter here.
Since 1976, more than 41,000 projects throughout the U.S. have benefited from the tax credit, generating $78.3 billion in investment and creating nearly 2.4 million jobs. The credit also pays for itself, with the $23.1 billion cost of the program offset by the $28.1 billion in tax receipts generated by projects receiving the credit.
One tax reform plan under consideration in Congress calls for elimination of most special-interest deductions and credits. In his letter to the chairman and ranking member of the committee, Donaldson noted that the 20 percent historic tax credit does not support a specific industry or locality, but it encourages the renovation of underutilized commercial properties for a wide range of uses in communities throughout the country.
ACHP Announces Community Revitalization Policy Statement
After years of research and study into the needs of communities across the U.S. who are struggling to revive their economies and historic assets, the ACHP has issued a policy statement aimed at helping to provide ideas and principles for successful community revitalization. Read more about how to help your community.
Agreement Reached for Four-State, 728-Mile Transmission Line
The proposed TransWest Express Transmission Line would move energy from Wyoming through Colorado and Utah, ending in southern Nevada, and provide power for up to 1.8 million homes in the Southwest each year. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has been consulting with more than 80 parties since 2012 in order to take effects on historic properties from this lengthy transmission line into account. On October 18, 2016, the ACHP signed the Programmatic Agreement (PA) that resulted from the consultation, completing the execution of the agreement.
The PA effectively addresses direct, indirect, and cumulative effects on historic properties. Building on the methodologies for assessing indirect effects done on previous transmission projects, this agreement reflects the most up-to-date thinking about addressing visual effects in landscape-scale projects (see Appendix C).
The BLM's outreach to the many interested parties in the four-state area is also of note. The agency invited 53 Indian tribes to participate in consultation, including two tribes whose reservation boundaries were crossed by the preferred alignment. Sidebar discussions between the project proponent, TransWest Express LLC, and the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation led to a joint press release about the proactive hiring of qualified tribal members for construction jobs, a job fair prior to the start of construction, and a career fair for high school students highlighting energy-related jobs. Prior to the ACHP's signature, 34 parties signed the PA, including four Indian tribes, indicating unusually broad consensus about the agreement. View the full Programmatic Agreement here.
ACHP Issues Guidance On Using Section 304 of the NHPA to Protect Sensitive Information About Historic Properties
The ACHP has issued a Frequently Asked Questions? guidance document on protecting sensitive information about historic properties under Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
Federal agency officials, SHPOs, THPOs, Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, and other stakeholders in the Section 106 process often ask ACHP staff how sensitive information about historic properties can be protected from public disclosure. This new guidance, available online here: builds upon the successful Section 304 Webinar the ACHP offers about how Section 304 works to protect such information and thereby prevent harm to historic properties. In developing this guidance, the ACHP coordinated closely with the NPS Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places program to ensure these FAQs identify the most commonly asked questions and provide helpful guidance to Section 106 practitioners as well as members of the public regarding what information may be withheld from disclosure, under what circumstances, and for what reasons.
ACHP Electronic Section 106 System Now Available to All Federal Agencies
The ACHP is pleased to announce the availability of its voluntary Electronic Section 106 Documentation Submittal System (e106) for use by any federal agency (or officially delegated non-federal entity) when notifying the ACHP of a finding of adverse effect, inviting the ACHP to be a consulting party to resolve adverse effects, or proposing to develop a Programmatic Agreement for complex or multiple undertakings.
The e106 system is designed to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and transparency of the Section 106 review process by providing federal agencies with an electronic submittal system that serves to expedite a critical step in Section 106 review and encourage complete and accurate submissions that can be shared with others. Read the announcement regarding the availability of this system; view the format form and instructions.
While federal agencies can continue to send hard copy documentation to the ACHP via regular mail, or electronically as a pdf, all agencies are encouraged to utilize e106 in their submissions to the ACHP.
The ACHP's Guidance on Agreement Documents is Now Available!
The ACHP is pleased to announce the availability of its new "Guidance on Agreement Documents" (GAD) now on our Web site at http://www.achp.gov/agreementdocguidance.html. It is best viewed from Google Chrome or Firefox.
Memoranda of Agreement and Programmatic Agreements play a critical role in documenting a federal agency's commitment to carry out and conclude its responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). GAD will assist all consulting parties—federal agencies, states, Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, applicants, local governments, and other stakeholders–to draft clear, concise, and complete Section 106 MOAs and PAs. Use of this guidance can also help minimize disputes regarding agreed upon measures down the line and save time that is better spent seeking creative and innovative ways to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. Read more.
ACHP Announces Release of Section 106 Applicant Toolkit
Read the ACHP’s press release about the Section 106 Applicant Toolkit. This Toolkit provides helpful tips and advice for applicants navigating the Section 106 process to make better informed decisions to improve outcomes in the review process and avoid unnecessary delays. It includes an overview of the Section 106 requirements and step by step guidance on consulting with states and Indian tribes, engaging stakeholders, and avoiding inadvertent activities that may adversely affect historic properties. Explore the toolkit here.
ACHP Guidance on Reasonable and Good Faith Efforts
Read the policy issued by ACHP.
Web-based Archaeology Guidance Now Available
D.C.—The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has developed
new archaeology guidance to assist federal agencies in meeting their
responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. The guidance is available at: www.achp.gov/archguide. Read more.
ACHP News Archive
Section 106 Archaeology Guidance
ACHP Guidance on Program Comments as a Program Alternative
Register for the ACHP's Section 106 Course
Economic Issues in Historic Preservation